Trends in ChatGPT and Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education Research: A Scopus Based Analysis

Main Article Content

Miftahul Jannah
Benny Prasetiya
Febry Suprapto
Khoiriyah

Abstract

The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technologies such as ChatGPT has transformed the landscape of education research, reshaping how knowledge is created, accessed, and disseminated. This study aims to analyze global research trends on ChatGPT and GenAI in education through a bibliometric analysis of Scopus-indexed publications from 2023 to 2025. Using a quantitative bibliometric approach with data visualization tools such as VOSviewer and Bibliometrix (R package), this research examines publication growth, scientific collaboration, influential authors and journals, and keyword co-occurrence networks. The PRISMA 2020 protocol was applied to ensure systematic and transparent data selection. The results show an exponential increase in research output on GenAI in education, with the United States, China, and Australia leading contributions. Thematic mapping reveals three dominant clusters: (1) ChatGPT and generative AI applications in higher education; (2) human-centered and ethical AI in learning; and (3) large language models (LLMs) in educational innovation. This study identifies ChatGPT as both a learning tool and an epistemic partner that enhances personalization, creativity, and efficiency in teaching and research. The novelty of this research lies in its development of the “Generative Education Ecosystem (GEE)” framework, integrating socio-technical systems and constructivist theories to explain human-AI collaboration in learning. The findings contribute empirically and theoretically to understanding the global trajectory of GenAI in education and provide strategic insights for policymakers and educators to foster adaptive, ethical, and sustainable AI-based learning systems.

Article Details

How to Cite
Trends in ChatGPT and Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education Research: A Scopus Based Analysis. (2026). Immortalis Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 315-339. https://doi.org/10.37600/sv5x7870
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Trends in ChatGPT and Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education Research: A Scopus Based Analysis. (2026). Immortalis Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 315-339. https://doi.org/10.37600/sv5x7870

References

Ahmed, A., Kerr, E., & O’Malley, A. (2025). Quality assurance and validity of AI-generated single best answer questions. BMC Medical Education, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06881-w

Almasri, Z., Bahgat, M., Seddek, A., & Elsafty, A. (2024). Maximizing the Benefits of ChatGPT with FIRST-ADLX Framework: Promoting Responsible, Ethical, and Impactful AI Integration in Education. 12(4), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v12i4.6933

An, Y., Yu, J. H., & James, S. (2025). Investigating the higher education institutions’ guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3

Bozkurt, A. (2023). Unleashing the Potential of Generative AI, Conversational Agents and Chatbots in Educational Praxis: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of GenAI in Education. Open Praxis, 15(4), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.4.609

Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3

Chen, J., Zhuo, Z., & Lin, J. (2023). Does ChatGPT Play a Double-Edged Sword Role in the Field of Higher Education? An In-Depth Exploration of the Factors Affecting Student Performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416928

Cherif, H., Moussa, C., Missaoui, A. M., Salouage, I., Mokaddem, S., & Dhahri, B. (2024). Appraisal of ChatGPT’s Aptitude for Medical Education: Comparative Analysis With Third-Year Medical Students in a Pulmonology Examination. JMIR Medical Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.2196/52818

Cooper, G. (2023). Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y

Creely, E., & Blannin, J. (2025). Creative partnerships with generative AI. Possibilities for education and beyond. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101727

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Flavin, E., Hwang, S., & Morales, M. (2025). “Let’s Ask the Robot!”: Epistemic Stance Between Teacher Candidates Toward AI in Mathematics Lesson Planning. Journal of Teacher Education, 76(3), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871251325079

Gilson, A., Safranek, C. W., Huang, T., Socrates, V., Chi, L., Taylor, R. A., & Chartash, D. (2023). How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment. JMIR Medical Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.2196/45312

Gonsalves, C. (2024). Generative AI’s Impact on Critical Thinking: Revisiting Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Marketing Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241305980

Hassoulas, A., Powell, N., Roberts, L., Umla-Runge, K., Gray, L., & Coffey, M. J. (2023). Investigating marker accuracy in differentiating between university scripts written by students and those produced using ChatGPT. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.13

Henriksen, D., Woo, L., & Mishra, P. (2024). Unlocking Creativity: Dr. Anna Abraham on Interdisciplinarity, AI, and Human Innovation. TechTrends, 68(5), 847–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-01002-8

Jacinto, E. J., Bertoncini, A. L. C., Figueiredo, M. C., Ames, D. C., & Serafim, M. C. (2024). The (lack of) ethics at generative AI in Business Management education and research. Revista de Administracao Mackenzie, 25(6). https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMD240061

Jackaria, P. M., Hajan, B. H., & Mastul, A.-R. H. (2024). A Comparative Analysis of the Rating of College Students’ Essays by ChatGPT versus Human Raters. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(2), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.23

Kelly, A., Sullivan, M., & Strampel, K. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence: University student awareness, experience, and confidence in use across disciplines. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.6.12

Kostas, A., Paraschou, V., Spanos, D., Tzortzoglou, F., & Sofos, A. (2025). AI and ChatGPT in Higher Education: Greek Students’ Perceived Practices, Benefits, and Challenges. Education Sciences, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050605

Kumar, P. (2025). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT usability on attitudes and beliefs among Indian higher education students: a structural analysis. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 18(3), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2025.145989

Lee, D., & Palmer, E. (2025). Prompt engineering in higher education: a systematic review to help inform curricula. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00503-7

Lendvai, G. F. (2025). ChatGPT in Academic Writing: A Scientometric Analysis of Literature Published Between 2022 and 2023. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 20(3), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251350203

Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. International Journal of Management Education, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790

Mahrishi, M., Abbas, A., Radovanović, D., & Hosseini, S. (2024). Emerging Dynamics of ChatGPT in Academia: A Scoping Review. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.53761/b182ws13

Mishra, P., Oster, N., & Henriksen, D. (2024). Generative AI, Teacher Knowledge and Educational Research: Bridging Short- and Long-Term Perspectives. TechTrends, 68(2), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00938-1

Nguyen, A., Kishore, S., Hong, Y., Qutab, S., & Dang, B. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education: from organizing visions to official guidelines. Information Technology and People, 38(8), 172–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2024-1026

Nikolic, S., Sandison, C., Haque, R., Daniel, S., Grundy, S., Belkina, M., Lyden, S., Hassan, G. M., & Neal, P. (2024). ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, SciSpace and Wolfram versus higher education assessments: an updated multi-institutional study of the academic integrity impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on assessment, teaching and learning in engineering. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 126–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2024.2372154

Nikolic, S., Suesse, T. F., Grundy, S., Haque, R., Lyden, S., Lal, S., Hassan, G. M., Daniel, S., & Belkina, M. (2025). Assessment integrity and validity in the teaching laboratory: adapting to GenAI by developing an understanding of the verifiable learning objectives behind laboratory assessment selection. European Journal of Engineering Education, 50(4), 673–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2025.2456944

Parmar, S., Suthar, P., Das, L., & Ganguly, P. (2025). Preparing future-ready public health professionals: a blended, AI-integrated pedagogical innovation. BMC Medical Education, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07850-z

Pham, T., Nguyen, B., Ha, S., & Nguyen, T. N. (2023). Digital transformation in engineering education: Exploring the potential of AI-assisted learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8825

Qin, Q., & Zhang, S. (2025). Visualizing the knowledge mapping of artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 449–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13076-1

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Sánchez Muñoz, J. A., Flores-Eraña, G., Silva-Campos, J. M., Chavira-Quintero, R., & Olais-Govea, J. M. (2025). GenAI as a cognitive mediator: a critical-constructivist inquiry into computational thinking in pre-university education. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1597249

Su, Y., Xu, S., & Liu, K. (2025). Adapt or adopt? Examining the efficacy of ChatGPT in providing translation feedback. Interpreter and Translator Trainer. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2025.2541486

Tajsic, S., Stjern-Vik, I., Meknas, D., & Bruusgaard, M. H. (2025). Use of and confidence in YouTube and ChatGPT in surgical teaching and training. BMC Medical Education, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07992-0

Teckwani, S. H., Wong, A. H.-P., Luke, N. V, & Low, I. C. C. (2024). Accuracy and reliability of large language models in assessing learning outcomes achievement across cognitive domains. Advances in Physiology Education, 48(4), 904–914. https://doi.org/10.1152/ADVAN.00137.2024

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Twinomurinzi, H., & Gumbo, S. (2025). Generative AI: Concerns, usage, challenges, opportunities and sentiments. South African Computer Journal, 37(1), 120–145. https://doi.org/10.18489/sacj.v37i1.17890

Vargas Bernuy, J. B., Nolasco-Mamani, M. A., Velásquez Rodriguez, N. C., Gambetta Quelopana, R. L., Martinez-Valdivia, A. N., & Espinoza-Vidaurre, S. M. (2025). Relative Advantage and Compatibility as Drivers of ChatGPT Adoption in Latin American Higher Education: A PLS SEM Study Towards Sustainable Digital Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188329

Zhang, Y., Xie, X., & Xu, Q. (2025). ChatGPT in Medical Education: Bibliometric and Visual Analysis. JMIR Medical Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.2196/72356

Zhu, Y., Liu, Q., & Zhao, L. (2025). Exploring the impact of generative artificial intelligence on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 30(11), 16211–16239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13420-z